|
2011 RESULTS OF SAIGA'S
REPORTING AWARDS
2011 ●
2010 ●
2009 ●
2008 ● 2007 ●
2006 ●
2005 ●
2004 ●
2003 ●
2002 ●
Awards Background
Click on the image
below to view the 2006 Annual Public Sector Reporting Awards Picture Gallery

Results of the Tenth Annual Public Sector Reporting Awards (financial year ends
2010) published September 2011

The Department of Agriculture the Western Cape
is the
overall winner of SAIGA's 2011 Reporting Awards (published September 2011).
Other salient features:
|
|
10th
Year
2011 |
9th Year 2010 |
8th Year 2009 |
7th Year 2008 |
6th Year 2007 |
5th Year 2006 |
4th Year 2005 |
3rd Year 2004 |
2nd Year 2003 |
1st Year 2002 |
|
Average score of all departments: |
87.44 |
87.27 |
87.36 |
86.35 |
84.95 |
86 |
82.83 |
80.49 |
75 |
70 |
|
Departments scoring above 70% |
All but one |
All but one |
144 |
142 |
132 |
142 |
134 |
122 |
91 |
47 |
|
Departments scoring above 90% |
41 |
42 |
39 |
35 |
21 |
25 |
19 |
11 |
1 |
3 |
|
Departments disqualified because their audit reports contained either a
disclaimer or an adverse audit opinion |
9 |
8 |
6 |
8 |
14 |
8 |
9 |
8 |
14 |
27 |
|
Departments disqualified because their annual
financial statements were not available (after numerous requests) |
7 |
1 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
The full list of 2011 winners for the financial reporting year ended 31 March
2010 is:
|
Category (Province) (alphabetically) |
|
Score |
Average % for category |
|
Overall Winner |
Agriculture (Western Cape) |
96.55 |
87.44 (all) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Cape (WC) |
Agriculture |
96.55 |
90.81 (WC) |
|
Mpumalanga |
Finance |
94.30 |
89.60 |
|
Free State |
Treasury |
94.03 |
90.20 |
|
KwaZulu-Natal |
Office of the Premier |
93.37 |
86.91 |
|
National |
Labour |
92.84 |
87.16 |
|
Eastern Cape |
Roads and Transport |
92.57 |
89.09 |
|
Gauteng |
Local Government & Housing |
92.57 |
85.24 |
|
North West |
Agriculture, Conservation, Environment & Rural Development |
91.38 |
85.24 |
|
Limpopo |
Local Government & Housing |
91.25 |
87.21 |
|
Northern Cape |
Economic Development & Tourism |
89.12 |
84.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Consistant |
Education (Western Cape) |
96.02 |
87.44 (all) |
Provincial statistics
|
Category (Province) (alphabetically) |
Score |
Average % for category |
|
Overall Winner |
96.55 |
87.44 (all) |
|
|
|
|
|
Most
consistent |
96.02 |
87.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
National |
92.84 |
87.16 |
|
Eastern Cape |
92.57 |
89.09 |
|
Free State |
94.03 |
90.20 |
|
Gauteng |
92.57 |
85.24 |
|
KwaZulu-Natal |
93.37 |
86.91 |
|
Limpopo |
91.25 |
87.21 |
|
Mpumalanga |
94.30 |
89.60 |
|
North West |
91.28 |
85.24 |
|
Northern Cape |
89.12 |
84.36 |
|
Western Cape |
96.55 |
90.81 |
Province
with highest average score:
The
Western Cape
province with an average score of 90.81 takes first place amongst provinces.
Independence statement:
The
Southern African Institute of Government Auditors received numerous offers for
sponsorship of this project and specific categories. We do, however, believe
that the information and the findings not only have to reflect absolute
independence but that SAIGA also has to be seen and perceived to be independent.
Consequently, no sponsor’s name is associated with the project – it is
completely self-funded and independent.
Quality
assurance statement:
The
quality assurance relating to the technical analysis and evaluation, is done by
the Department of Auditing, University of Pretoria.
Media
statement:
Professor Dieter Gloeck, Executive President of SAIGA and Chairperson of the
Award Committee, praised the high scoring departments and pointed to the overall
sustained improvement in adherence to reporting standards since the inception of
the awards ten years ago.
Consistent scores of above 90 percent are evidence that government departments
apply the highest reporting standards – often confused with and overshadowed by
media reports of mismanagement of funds and corruption. Whilst the occurrence of
corruption and mismanagement is by no means condoned, positive publicity should
also be given to achievements which relate to good accountability.
The
proper disclosure (according to the reporting standards which are evaluated by
the SAIGA Reporting Awards) of information relating to, for example fruitless
and wasteful expenditure, irregular and unauthorised expenditure is after all
the main source of information for the public debate: full sunshine enables and
empowers.
SAIGA’s
Executive President highlighted the fact that the statutory performance
reporting requirements of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) and the
Treasury Regulations provided the South African public with a wealth of
information not only about the financial results of the departments in an
understandable format, but also gave a detailed account of the objectives which
were set and whether or not these objectives were met. Further information which
has to be disclosed includes reasons for non-performance and actions taken to
rectify the situation.
“If the
financial and performance disclosure requirements are compared to those of the
private sector and especially listed companies which attract investments from
the general public, it becomes clear to what extent the private sector
accountability arrangements lack behind the public sectors’. Yet the media
awards hardly any attention to the achievements in terms of financial reporting
in the public sector” remarks Gloeck.
The
SAIGA Reporting Awards are now firmly established and have become a highly
visible instrument and benchmark to monitor public accountability and
transparency in national and provincial departments.
[ 2011 RESULTS ][
TOP 20 LIST
][
MOST CONSISTENT DEPARTMENT
]
[
BACK TO THE TOP ]
The TOP 20 list of the Tenth SAIGA Reporting Awards - 2011
Since the competition in this
year’s SAIGA Reporting Awards was intense, special mention should also be made
of departments which achieved a high score, but were not category winners. SAIGA
has therefore
decided to publish a “Top 20” list.
|
Position |
Name of Department |
Percentage |
Category (Province) |
|
1 |
Agriculture |
96.55 |
Western Cape |
|
2 |
Education |
96.02 |
Western Cape |
|
3 |
Social Development |
95.49 |
Western Cape |
|
4 |
Finance |
94.30 |
Mpumalanga |
|
5 |
Treasury |
94.03 |
Free State |
|
5 |
Office of the Premier |
93.37 |
KwaZulu Natal |
|
7 |
Provincial Parliament |
93.24 |
Western Cape |
|
8 |
Economic Development, Environment & Tourism |
92.97 |
Mpumalanga |
|
9 |
Labout |
92.84 |
National |
|
9 |
Transport & Public Works |
92.84 |
Western Cape |
|
11 |
Statistics |
92.71 |
National |
|
12 |
Roads & Transport |
92.57 |
Eastern Cape |
|
12 |
Local Government & Housing |
92.57 |
Gauteng |
|
14 |
Education |
92.44 |
National |
|
15 |
Office of the Premier |
92.31 |
Eastern Cape |
|
16 |
Agriculture |
92.18 |
Free State |
|
16 |
Office of the Premier |
92.18 |
Western Cape |
|
18 |
Public Works, Roads & Transport |
92.04 |
Mpumalanga |
|
18 |
Social Development |
92.04 |
Mpumalanga |
|
18 (20) |
Environmental Affairs |
92.04 |
Western Cape |
|
18 (21) |
Provincial Treasury |
92.04 |
Western Cape |
[ 2011 RESULTS ][
TOP 20 LIST
][
MOST CONSISTENT DEPARTMENT
]
[
BACK TO THE TOP ]
Most consistent departments SAIGA Reporting Awards - 2011
The prestige of achieving the most consistent high performance
over the past three years agan goes to the Department of
Education (refer to table below).
|
Position |
Name of Department |
Combined score of the three Award years |
|
1 |
Education (Western Cape) |
10 |
|
2 |
Finance (Mpumalanga) |
11 |
|
3 |
Education (National) |
20 |
|
4 |
Office of the Premier (Eastern Cape) |
36 |
|
5 |
Provincial Parliament |
42 |
|
6 |
Social Development (Western Cape) |
47 |
|
7 |
Sport, Arts, Culture & Recreation (Free State) |
50 |
|
8 |
Transport & Public Works (Western Cape) |
54 |
|
9 |
Office of the Premier (Western Cape) |
63 |
|
10 |
Agriculture (Western Cape) |
64 |
Methodology: The positions of the departments on the Top 20 list in the 2011,
2010 and 2009 years were added to arrive at a combined score. Where two
departments have the same score the position in this year's Top 20 is deciding.
The lower the combined score, the more consistent the department's performance
over the three years.
The winners of the 2011 SAIGA
Annual Public Sector Reporting Awards in the North West Province: The
Department of Agriculture and Rural Development – best financial statements in
the North West Province.

Seated from left to right: The
Accounting Officer (Head of Department)
Mr. Iqbal Motala, MEC Mr. Boitumelo Tshwene and Chief Financial Officer Mr.
Pakiso Mothupi.
Standing from left to right: Mr.
Thabang Tseladimitloa - Chief Director for District Services, Dr. Poncho
Mokaila - Chief Director for Agricultural Support Services and Mr. Malakia
Matlhabe - Director for Policy and Planning.
[ 2011 RESULTS ][
TOP 20 LIST
][
MOST CONSISTENT DEPARTMENT
]
[
BACK TO THE TOP ]
|